Diagnostic Models Essay Example for Free

Diagnostic Models EssayAn fundamental law is an open agreement that is in constant interaction with its surroundings, winning in raw materials, people, information, and energy, converting these into products or services, and exporting the latter back into the environment but these makeup essential to regularly undergo the diagnosis of the current functioning of the organization so that interventionists should be able to get along whether the organization is performing well or not and what changes has to be incorporated so that the main revolve around of organization to do faithfulness fulfilled. But it should be planned, systematic and explicit. Well- through with(p) assessments or diagnosis is make on the basis of symptomatic examples depending upon which molding a company adopts to diagnose. This bind revolves around 11 diagnostic shapes that had been constructed salvageing in mind the strategies for organizations development but these models have limitations t oo. Models atomic number 18 tracerect Force Field Analysis (1951) Leavitts Model (1965).Likert System Analysis (1967) Open Systems Theory (1966) Weisbords Six-Box Model (1976) Congruence Model for government Analysis (1977) McKinsey 7S Framework (1981-82) Tichys Technical Political cultural (TPC) Framework (1983) High- feat Programming (1984) Diagnosing Individual and Group Behavior (1987).The Burke-Litwin Model of Organizational Performance Change Each model is unique in itself but on that point atomic number 18 issues with these models too i. e.there is much or less variables are missing from every model but B-L model of organization performance change has been conceived on the basis of theoretical and empirical literature on organizational behavior. Moreover this model similarly covered the variables which other model didnt cover that means it is self sufficient model for diagnosis purpose.1. Main issue of this article is that most of the models missed one or more gre at variables like no feedback loop is there, no consideration of environment, no standardized outperform labels , key variables are relatively broad and undefined etc.There is doubt regarding support for the relationships among the variables constructed in model. Moreover model doesnt address the role of foreign environment in bringing about the change in any of the variables (Leavitts model) There is no illustration to depict the framework (motivation, communication, interaction, decision making, goal setting, control, and performance) of Likert system analysis model which is based on four variant types of management systems at bottom organizations.These are right off Likert made the instrument to test the perception of employees based on above mentioned systems but the instrument did not have standardized scale labels such as strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, and strongly disagree. Instead, Likert provided customized scale labels for each question and resulted in minimum information. Open system theory model overemphasis on variables within the organization and there is absence of any feedback from the environment even though this model assume that organization is dependent on environment.Formal system (policies and procedures the organization to claim) informal system (behaviors of employee which actually occurs) are missing from the six box model which unleashes the fact that this gap make an organization less military unitive. Also there is discrepancy between what organization is and what should be? TPC Model only highlights the questions regarding the diagnosis of technical, political and cultural components.The resources and outputs(variables) in the Diagnosing Individual and Group Behavior model are linked by main cable television service of influence and feedback loops which are not reciprocal and also the extensive usage of these lines make it difficult to rede the relationship between variables. Key variables ar e relatively broad and undefined (Force field analysis) In legion(predicate) models it is not clearly expressed whether variables are merely correlated or whether a cause and effect relationship between variables is thought to exist. Questions that article tried to answer are.Q1. What is the main purpose to construct the diagnostic models? Q2. What are the scopes of diagnosis and what is the problem related to narrow diagnosis? Q3. How diagnosis can be done in a systematic way? Q4. To what extend does the various mentioned diagnostic models are effective for organization? Q5. Why organizations diagnosticians should not be rigid regarding adhering to one model (limited variables)? Q6. What are the different types of organizations and how do they function? Q7. What is congruency of model? Q8.What is political, technical and cultural dynamics related to diagnostic model? Q9. How constitution of relationships between variables in various model differ? Q10. What are the key features of B-L Model that set it isolated from other models? Q11. Why validation of any diagnostic model is vital? What are the procedure to affirm a model? Q12. What are the findings of studies done on the variables of B-L diagnostic model? Q13. What is difference between travel guidebook analysis and structural equation modeling? What are the key features of SEM that make it preferable procedure to underpin a diagnostic model?Diagnostic models identify different vital organizations variable. varying are correlated i. e they are reciprocal or leave one way impact. Organizations diagnosticians should not be rigid regarding adhering to one model. Assessment and improvement of organization depends upon the involvement of external environment in any diagnostic model. There is a fit between organization and environment i. e. what is and what should be done in an organization Validity of a diagnostic model is necessary forrader conceptualizing it along the empirical investigations.textlist-i tem B-L model covered all the variables in form of transformation and transitional along with environment and feedback loop after theoretical and empirical studies which is self sufficient model and keep it apart from other models, to adopt by any organization for diagnosis Key message of this article is that only theoretical and empirical studies are not feasible for conceptualizing any model but also validating it becomes necessary otherwise there could be one or more variables can bemissed out or they may also act as restraining forces in the path of excellence of any organization. According to me B-L model dont have any loophole in it.There are several key features of B-L Model which set it apart from the other models are textlist-item.