.

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

'Scholarly Writing Skills\r'

'Writing in a profound room is one of the most difficult tasks for a student. It involves the correct knowledge, comprehension, and expertise to be adequate to puzzle a good output. One key attainment in scholarly writing is being up to(p) to compose statements and paragraphs with reliable content. This means that there should be adequate sustenance evidence to posed arguments. Also, decorous citations on both in-text and reference book list moldiness be let ind to avoid plagiarism.\r\nAnother important expertness is producing a readable output. Readability is achieved finished writing in a scientific manner which means that words and statements should be clear and concise. highfaluting words and vague statements should be avoided (Goldbort, 2001). Lastly, an important skill in scholarly writing is being consistent with standard academic conventions for writing. This means that the output should follow basic grammar rules and uptake correct style, tone, and argument constitution (Hall, 2000).\r\nHall (2000) discussed in detail the basic grammar rules which include writing in complete sentences, subject-verb agreement, appropriate punctuation, powerful vocabulary, and correct use of apostrophe. Furthermore, she explained the style conventions which include typing and spelling, avoidance of abbreviations, capitalization of letters, etc. A author should as well write formally (avoiding cliches and jargons) and make fair use of paragraphs that involve analysis and answering the questions or supporting the thesis (Hall, 2000).\r\nOn the other hand, I need to improve and learn common referencing styles as I am only familiar with the American Psychological Association format. Based on feedbacks from my professors, I am able to provide good fall over of literature containing supportive and thinking(a) evidences for my thesis, but my skills in providing entire in-text and reference citations should be improved. Another view that I need to improv e on is forming sound arguments. Sometimes, I provide excessively many cultivation and focus too much on particularised details that the most important subject or even the answer to the question is not emphasise in my writing.\r\nThese are the two skills in that I need to improve the most. Meanwhile, I am able to produce readable outputs that helps my readers understand my writing easily. I have learned and practiced not too use cliches and jargons in academic writing. I withal allot ample time in proofreading my publications in order to minimize and correct grammatical and typographical errors before I submit them. The outdo way to improve my skill in accurate referencing style is by studying the common reference styles used in scholarly writing such(prenominal) as the APA, MLA, Turabian, and AMA.\r\nIt is also important to consider when to use these types of referencing styles aside from learning how to use their format (Delany, n. d. ) To care for my lack of competence i n forming sound arguments, I need to organize my thoughts by structuring an outline on my topics and subtopics so that my statements and paragraphs would be coherent and clear. I would also need to define exactly the question I need to answer, the supporting evidences for my answer, and the analysis and critique of the supporting statements that I presented.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment