.

Friday, February 22, 2019

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Spiritual Needs Among Patients with Cancer and Family

Running head PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS OF SPIRITUAL Prevalence and Associated Factors of unearthly Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Family angel dusts Prevalence and Associated Factors of Spiritual Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Family Cargongiver Problem Statement Identify crabby person forbearings and their c atomic number 18givers phantasmal needfully and amount the prevalence of these eldritch require. The longanimouss and their caregivers can have similar eldritch inescapably that may require care. However, a nurses help with these sacred needs, may not always be wanted.So how does the nurse light upon the ghostlike needs? If and when these needs are identified, how is the nurse to approach these needs? Study Purpose This teach is significant to nursing because it reveals nurses must be better to recognize and nurture various religious needs (Johnston Taylor, 2006, p. 734). enquiry Questions 1. ) How prevalent are the spiritual needs of patien ts with cancer and family caregivers, from their perspective? 2. ) What demographic and illness-related factors are associated with type and frequency of perceived spiritual needs? . ) What are the patients and family caregivers expectations regarding nurses addressing their spiritual needs? ((Johnston Taylor, 2006, p. 730) Hypothesis/Hypotheses The ponder hypothesis is all pack have spiritual needs, but the importance varies as do their beliefs. The bank for nurses to assist in these spiritual needs vary according to what is the patients religion, are they an inpatient, and perception of an incurable disease. Study Variables The independent covariant is the questionnaire. The dependent variables are the query actors.Conceptual Model/Theoretical theoretical account A theoretical framework was used to guide this study by examining throngs definition of spiritual needs, surveying oncology nurses, and looking at studies d superstar metre spiritual needs of cancer patients. The Institute of Medicine defined spiritual needs as the needs and expectations that humans have to find meaning, purport and value in their life ((Murray, Kendall, Boyd, Worth, & Benton, 2004, p. 730). Whether religious or not, all people have various ways of believing to give their life take aim and meaning.Some may connect spiritually with what they call a higher(prenominal) power, nature, or other human beings. A survey was done in 1995 with 181 oncology nurses and their perception of patients spiritual needs. They identified factors as patients talking virtually paragon or faith, meaning of life, or hopelessness or guilt. But also identified much subtle expressions of spiritual need (e. g. , anxiety, anger, restlessness, sadness, withdrawal, difficulty coping) ((Johnston Taylor, Amenta, & Highfield, 1995, p. 730).thither have been many studies done measuring spiritual well-being and fictional character of life, but there has been only one that cerebrate on the spiritual ne eds of those with cancer. ((Moadel et al. , 1999, p. 730) Review of link Literature The literature supports the need for this study because all people believe in spirituality in few normal and have needs. Cancer patients in previous studies have discussed their spiritual well-being and quality of life, but only one study focused on their spiritual needs. As healthcare providers we need to become educated to these spiritual needs and how to address them.Study Design This study is a descriptive design because of the need to gain more information about spiritual needs in cancer patients and their family caregivers. And also if patients require or request a nurses care regarding their spiritual needs. At least 2 threats to the internal validity of this design would be weft referable to inadequate number of non-Euro-Americans in the study and mortality due to the small number of search participants at 156 cancer patients and 68 family caregivers. there were no threats found to the external validity of this study design.Sample and background signal The sample included 156 cancer patients and 68 family caregivers. This sample of research participants delineated the target population for this study by focusing on someones and their family unnatural by cancer and their spiritual needs. The setting was appropriate because each individual was given the option to speak face to face with a research team member or take home the Spiritual Interests Related to unwellness Tool (SpIRIT) questionnaire. They all chose the questionnaire that was developed specifically for this study.Each participant faultless the questionnaire without help from the research team and then returned to a so-so(p) party that was not a member of the research team and elect by the institutional research board. Identification and Control of Extraneous Variables The one extraneous variable noted was the SpIRIT questionnaire had not be offered forward to this study. By using a neutral party t o receive the completed questionnaires helped alleviate potential problems. Study Instruments/Tools Used the Spiritual Interests Related to Illness Tool (SpIRIT) questionnaire Data Collection/MethodsThe data collection methods were appropriate for this study because of offering this study without pressure to participate and to remain anonymous. Data abstract Procedures The data analysis procedure was appropriate for this type of data pile up because they measured the central tendency (average) from the SpIRIT and the Information About You form checked all SpIRIT items and removed one item that agree poorly and performed a factor analysis to determine SpIRIT validity. then(prenominal) computed coefficient alphas. StrengthsThe 2 major strengths of the scientific virtuousness of this study were * Those that who perceive more spiritual needs may be most receptive to nurses spiritual caregiving ((Johnston Taylor, 2006, p. 733) * Religious people (as indicated by frequency of attenda nce at religious services) not only are more apt to consider spiritual needs important but also have more * longing for nurses assistance with such needs ((Johnston Taylor, 2006, p. 733) Limitations The 2 major limitations of the scientific merit of this study were * Samples of patients and family caregivers were from cancer patients that were not life threatening. SpIRIT was a radical test performed. Extent that study findings are valid are attest by the spiritual needs cancer patients and their family caregivers do have. The study findings are practical for nursing practice and education because the analysis suggest cancer patients that may be a higher risk for spiritual hurt and would benefit from a more-focused spiritual assessment. Implications Implications for practice would be to include entryway questions related to the patients spiritual beliefs and/or values any special needs related to religion or spirituality.And follow-up to have their needs met, tape on patient ele ctronic medical record for all knotted in care to continue same care throughout patient stay. Implications for education would be attend classes related to cultural and religious differences, meanings and needs. Implications for research would be to extend this study to a larger group and assorted cultures, religions, and terminally ill. References Johnston Taylor, E. (2006). Prevalence and Associated Factors of Spiritual Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Family Caregivers. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33 (4), 729-735. Johnston Taylor, E. , Amenta, M. & Highfield, M. (1995). Spiritual care practices of oncology nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum, 22(), 31-39. Moadel, A. , Morgan, C. , Fatone, A. , Grennan, J. , Carter, J. , & Laruffa, G. et al. (1999). Seeking meaning and hope Self-reported spiritual and existential needs among an ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Psycho-Oncology, 8, 378-385. Murray, S. , Kendall, M. , Boyd, K. , Worth, A. , & Benton, T. (2004). Exploring th e spiritual needs of people dying of lung cancer or heart tribulation A prospective qualitative interview study of patients and their carers. Palliative Medicine, 18(), 39-45.

No comments:

Post a Comment