Cell Phones And Academic Performance English Language Essay

prison cubicle Phones And faculty subdivision Per goance English Langu climb on Es differentiateThe toleration of electric cell mobilises by young generation has been a global phenomenon in recent years. Thus, with the emergence of this technology al more or less everyone has tried to adopt these cell resounds. We appoint in this research that cell mobilize exercising had a ostracise stupor on students GPA. Students apply their cell recollect during secern, they excessively receiving and sending schooling textual matter pass ons during their class so they were able to pay slight attention to lecture and thus it had negative impact on students process.Key terms Cell yells rule, donnish deed, GPAIntroductionSince the commercialization of cellular yells technology, the intention of this communication device has rapidly increased. To daylight, the global cellular ear visit market immediately stands at approximately 1.8 billion subscribers, and is forecasted t o carry through 3 billion by the end of 2010 (Reid and Reid, 2007). In Pakistan total subscribers for cell recalls till 12 September 2012 establish reached to 120,513,430 (Pakistan Telecommunication Authority). The adoption of cell environs by young generation has been a global phenomenon in recent years. This cell phone was originally created for adults for business use (Aoki Downes, 2003). It has become an integral part of adolescents daily life and one of the about popular forms of electronic communication. In todays world almost every student is having cell phone in their pocket, clipped to a belt, or hidden in a brief case or udder and knows perfect usage of it. As technology is growing every day at very close rate, and is bringing positive and negative effects for society and so is with cell phone technology that has brought two positive and negative effects. It is comm scarce observed that these cell phones hire besides become status attribute for callowness and they have indulged themselves in the competition of having best and most updated cell phone with maximum features.Todays youth prefer cell phones more as comp bed to internet or any other social activity. non only young tidy sum own cell phone, they have symbolic and touch onive investment in them (Lobet-maris, 2003) and they excessively want to upgrade it as soon as new model is launched in the market. Cell phones atomic number 18 that much involved in our life that the person who own cell phone is slant to be thought socially connected, in hooklike, modern and in demand by the society. One of the most utilize applications of cell phones by our young generation is text messaging and these cellular network companies have also played a vital role in negatively affecting our young generation by introducing a number of packages for text messaging and calls also. Students of today ar master in fastest text messaging and ar seen text messaging while at home, at university, trave ling ,in classroom and in particular while studying.Communication with fellow students, professors, upgrades, and everyone else is on the dot a click away. In new-made Zealand study 56% of high school students inform that the most important reason for use a cell phone was to talk and text with friends and family (Netsafe, 2005).This research paper explores the impact of cell phones usage on students academic performance. We examined the affect of smooth usage on the grades among university students.Literature ReviewCell phones and academic performanceThe invention of the heady telephone in the late 19th century in the United States changed the way that slew interacted and communicated (Marilyn, 2005). This has been paralleled in the early 21st century by the advent of the cell phone (Marilyn, 2005). This is extremely similar to the ameliorate telephone in the early 20th century, where telephone engineers explained that the telephone was made for the business world and non for social conversation (Flinchy, 1997). The growth of cell phone technology is demonstrated by the fact that in 2002 the number of cell phone users worldwide, surpassed those of fixed-phone users (Srivastava, 2005). In 2005, the number of cell phone subscribers worldwide provide reach 2 billion (Deloitte Research, 2005) and in Australia lead reach 19.2 million (Fisher, 2005). And in Pakistan total fixed phone subscriber by celestial latitude 2011 reached to only 3,098,117, less than mobile phone subscriber that were 120,151,253 till December 2011 (Pakistan Telecommunication Authority). In Norway in 1999, 80% of 13 to 20-year- agings owned a cell phone, while in the United Kingdom in 2001, 90% of young people under the age of 16 did so (www.capacitybuilder.co.uk). In 2003, in Italy, 56% of children aged 9 and 10-years-old owned cell phones and of the 44% who didnt, all uttered a desire to own one (Guardian Unlimited, 2003), and amongst teenage girls in Tokyo, the adoption rate is almost blow% (Srivastava, 2005). In Australia in 2004, a survey by iTouch found that 50,000 children aged in the midst of 5 and 9 years of age owned a cell phone, one third of children aged 10 to 13-years old and 45% of 13 to 15-year-olds also owned the device ( aloneison, 2004). Surveys have consistently shown that young people rase prefer their cell phone to television or the Internet (Enpocket, 2005 Hession, 2001). It is childrens favourite method of communication (Livingstone Bober, 2005) with jr. adolescents (school years 7 to 9) more attached to their cell phones than older adolescents (school years 10 to 12) as they reported needing to return home to collect their phone if they forget it (Matthews, 2004). Young people also save text contentednesss which they value and cherish (Taylor Harper, 2003).Thus, with the emergence of this technology almost everyone has tried to adopted these cell phones.The main emersion for teachers is the disturbance created in class room o verdue to cell phone calls and texting. The functionality of SMS lets students send and receive messages unobtrusively (Geser, 2004). Combining this with the ease of hiding the device due to its small size, grounds it very difficult for teachers to control. Because of the short prison term frame in which an answer is expected to a message (Kasesniemi Rautiainen, 2002), the excitement of finding out who has called and what the message is (similar to snail mail letters), young people are reluctant to turn off their cell phone during class epoch. In an Italian survey of 9- and 10-year-olds, 86% of students who owned cell phones kept them on during lessons (Guardian Unlimited, 2003). The New Zealand survey also found that 66% of students who took a mobile phone to school kept it sullen on at school (Netsafe, 2005).Campbell (2006) found that students and faculty view the ringing of cell phones in class to be a serious problem. It is clear that if students are spending time texting, they are not paying(a) attention to the class lecture, will not be able to understand the topic and will not be able to produce good allow in class, this will have impact on their grade points. Through common observation today students are busy with this technology, spends 90% of their time with cell phones and dont pay attention to their studies. And if they pretend to their parents that they are studying in their room, they are actually dodging their parents, it is much(prenominal) a small device that they can easily hide them and lie with their parents. Students are trying to make as many other(prenominal) friends whether girl or boy as they can, keeping themselves busy all day and night, as these network companies for their own profit have introduced a lots of cheap packages for call and messaging. All these activities in which students have engaged themselves in todays world are razing their posture and future.Students are using this technology not only for text messaging in class but also use it as source of cheating in examination. Students have always cheated via taking greenbacks into class, or writing notes on hands (Ling, 2000a). For example, 12 students at the University of Maryland were caught cheating during an traceing exam (Anonymous 2003).With many cell phones now incorporating a digital camera or video, there is a danger in schools, colleges and universities that inappropriate pictures will be taken because of the portability and discrete nature of the camera (Marilyn, 2005). Pictures can be taken quickly without the familiarity of the person being photographed.Stealing of cell phones is also an issue which can impact on school staff (Williams Williams, 2005). Most victims of mobile phone theft are under 18 years of age and the phones are stolen by the same age group as well. This can put additional tense on school administration if the theft occurs at or near school and staff are expected to investigate (Marilyn, 2005).After expla ining negative aspect there are some positive impact also, it helps students to stay connected with their group members when assigned some group work from their teacher. In school it also helps teacher to tell their parents about any serious problem happened to the students and also helps teacher to text their parent if they are absent from school.Students are supposed to use mobile phones whole night texting their friends. It is interesting to note that there are few common family rules about young peoples use of the cell phone. In fact, many adolescents (58%) reported that there were no rules coiffure by their parents about their cell phone use, and only 12% reported that their parents used removal of their cell phones as punishment (Matthews, 2004). In New Zealand, this increased to 26% of young cell people reporting being threatened, with the phone being confiscated, as a form of punishment (Netsafe, 2005). It has been found that some young peoples sleep is disturbed when frien ds call them on their cell phone to talk or when a text message is deposited (Anderson, 2003). In New Zealand 11% of young people reported being woken every night by a text message or interpreter call (Netsafe, 2005). Probably because of the sleeping issue it has been found that the most common rule set by parents (56%) was that children have to leave their cell phones out of their rooms at night. Ten percent of young people also reported that their parents frequently had to ask them to stop using their mobile phone late at night with 12% consecrateing that this was the most common disagreement between them and their parents (Matthews, 2004).Along with academic performance cell phones have also positively and negatively affected social human relationships. With the emergence of mobile phones individuals are able to stay connected with their friends, family and relatives living abroad. In addition to keeping up with social relationships, individuals have also been able to increase productivity with their work because they can be hundreds of miles away from the office, and still have instant access to their e-mail, documents and contacts wherever they are (Tully, 2003). A trend that is becoming more apparent is present absences this is the concept of how an individuals presence in a social setting changes regardless of their physical presence, they are only half-present (Fortunati 2008). After a ring or buzz of their cell phone, they are drawn away somewhere else, away from their present situation and/or conversation. Through observation, researchers have found that individuals typically will not hesitate to interrupt an ongoing conversation to answer the ringing of their cell phone.Cell phones have tending(p) a new way to individuals to form new relationships and to strengthen existing ones. Teens admitted spending nearly an fit amount of time talking as they do texting each month. The feature is so important to them that if texting was no longer an option, 47 percent of teens say their social life would end or be worsen especially among effeminates (54 percent compared to 40 percent of males) (CTIA Survey 2008).Before the emergence of mobile technology, individuals have firm interaction with one another. As they have very little telephonic contact with one another so they are used to visit each other homes regularly. Even if any one of the family member is in hospital, their loved ones even if out of city make a visit instantly or the next day but now with the emergence of cell phones people are supposed to just ask about their health on phone call with their cell phones.HypothesisCell phones usage will have a negative affect on students academic performance.ModelCell phone usageAcademic performanceMethodologyThe data was collected by distributing questionnaire to students of different universities in Pakistan with the ages ranging between eighteen and thirty. A sample size of 150 students was taken in which 65 respondents were m ale and 85 respondents were female.The survey consisted of 24 questions, including cell phone impacts on students academic performance and social relationship. Multiple choice questions were asked. The reliability of the instrument was calculated by using SPSS. The instrument was personally administered to the sample. Demographic information (e.g., age, gender, university, degree, GPA) was also collected.ResultsAfter successfully collecting the data through distributing questionnaires in different universities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, we have inserted that data in SPSS software data sheet and run desired functions necessary to know that what impact does autarkic uncertain (cell phone usage ) have on dependent variable (students academic performance). We have evaluated students academic performance by considering their GPA.From the correlation results as shown in TABLE 1, we have find that cell phone usage is having negative impact on students GPA i.e. (r= -0.303, pTABLE 1Corr elation ResultsM S.D 1 2 3 4Age 21.487 1.8672 1Gender 1.58 0.49521 -0.184*Cell phone usage 3.267 0.4512 0.045 -0.149 1GPA 1.9911 0.57583 -0.154 0.246** -0.303** 1**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 train (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).TABLE 2Regression ResultsPredictor Academic performance(GPA) Sig. measuring rod 1Age -0.27 0.164Gender 0.205 0.006Step 2Age -0.26 0.167Gender 0.169 0.020Cell phone usage -0.212 0.072 0.001The table 2 shows the regression result of dependent and independent variable. In step 1 control variables i.e. age, gender is shown and in step 2 independent variable i.e. cell phone usage is shown. In horizontal line we have dependent variable i.e. academic performance measured using students GPA.The fluctuation in students academic performance (GPA) due to cell phone usage is 72%. The impact of cell phones usage on student academic performance is negative i.e. ( = -0.212). Which implies that the student whose usage o f cell phone is more is having low GPA i.e. presentation poor academic performance.DiscussionIn this research paper we have evaluated that what impact students cell phone usage has on their academic performance by considering their GPA. Students age and gender is also taken into account while running analysis using SPSS. Cell phone usage is taken as independent variable and students academic performance is taken as dependent variable. Questionnaires are given to be fill by students of different universities in Rawalpindi and Islamabad between the age of 18 and 30. The data collected is canvas by using SPSS software and evaluated the impact of cell phones usage on students academic performance.The result shows that cell phones usage is negatively impacting students academic performance. This means that the students who are using cell phone more are having low GPA. On asking questions on how much time they spend on using their cell phone and in how many classes they use cell phone, we have found that there is negative relationship of these two questions with students GPA. That is the students who are using cell phone almost 7-10 hours and those also who use cell phone during their most of the classes are having low GPA. On asking random questions we have found that one of the most used feature of cell phone is text messaging used by 67% students (female 37% and male 30%). Almost 81% students (female 46%, male 35%) are using metre text messages as compared to multimedia messages or other. 43% students (31% female and 13% male) say that they put their mobile phone on silent mode while attending class. 35% students (20% female and 15% male) say that they occasionally receive or send text messages while the class was in session. 55% students (35% female and 20% male) agree on policy that mobile should be kept by students but they should set it in vibration mode. 61% students (40% female, 21% male) say that they do not use night packages on their cell phone. 42% s tudents (23% female, 19% male) say that they use day packages on their cell phone. 67% students (39% female, 27% male) say that they spent 10% of their pocket money on cell phones. 56% students (32% female, 24% male) say that they sometimes use their cell phone while doing their assignments.As results show that those students who spend most of their time on cell phone are achieving low GPA, which is in accordance with the literature and common observation. Students are using their cell phone during class, they are also receiving and sending text messages during their class so they will be able to pay less attention to lecture and thus it will have negative impact on students performance. Some students are also using night packages on their cell phone which will make them unable to be attentive in their morning class or may be unable to attend the first class. It is better to activate missed call alert on their cell phone and put it off during class and when they will on it they wil l receive message of all the calls they missed when the cell phone was off. In last concluding all cell phone usage is significantly impacting our youth who are misusing this technology, and thus showing poor academic performance and demolishing their career opportunities.